Home » Recent Changes to Murder Laws in Los Angeles and Their Impact

Understanding how Murder Laws in Los Angeles have evolved is crucial for anyone facing charges or supporting a loved one in the criminal justice system. California’s legislature has reshaped several key homicide statutes in recent years, and these reforms significantly influence how prosecutors file charges, how courts impose penalties, and how defendants defend themselves. A knowledgeable Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer can help navigate these changes and protect a defendant’s rights at every stage.
Recent updates to murder laws in Los Angeles have reshaped how certain cases are prosecuted and reviewed, especially those involving accomplice liability and sentence enhancements. These reforms aim to create fairer outcomes by reassessing intent, participation, and the level of responsibility in serious offenses. Understanding these changes is essential for anyone facing investigation or charges under evolving legal standards.
California shifted its approach to murder liability to improve fairness and prevent overly harsh penalties for people who did not intend to kill. For decades, broad doctrines like the felony murder rule and accomplice liability allowed prosecutors to charge individuals with murder even if they neither committed the killing nor intended that anyone die. Public pressure, wrongful conviction cases, and sentencing disparities motivated lawmakers to reconsider the framework.
The most influential reforms came from SB 1437 (2019) and SB 775 (2022). These laws narrowed felony murder liability, limited accomplice responsibility, and expanded opportunities for resentencing. They also reinforced the requirement that prosecutors prove intent, malice, or major participation before securing a murder conviction.
These legal updates have also redefined how different forms of murder are classified, setting clearer boundaries for the levels of intent and involvement that prosecutors must prove before filing charges.
First-degree murder traditionally required willful, deliberate, and premeditated actions. While this remains true, prosecutors now face stricter requirements to show clear intent. Killings that occur during certain felonies no longer automatically count as first-degree murder unless the defendant acted as a major participant and showed reckless indifference to human life.
Second-degree murder still covers intentional but unplanned killings or extremely reckless conduct. However, courts now more closely examine the defendant’s state of mind, requiring stronger proof of implied malice. This limits prosecutors’ discretion to elevate charges solely based on the crime’s outcome.
Under SB 1437, a person can only be convicted of felony murder if they:
• Was the actual killer
• Aided or abetted the killing with the intent to kill
• Were a major participant in the felony and acted with reckless indifference to life
This change dramatically reduces the number of people who can be charged with murder based solely on participation in a felony.
California eliminated the “natural and probable consequences” doctrine for murder. This means an accomplice cannot be convicted simply because a death occurred during a crime they assisted with. Instead, prosecutors must show intent, major participation, or specific actions tied directly to the killing.
These reforms don’t just affect new filings; they also have significant implications for individuals with pending cases or past convictions currently under review.
Individuals convicted under felony murder or natural-and-probable-consequences theories may seek resentencing if they would not be convicted under today’s standards. Both SB 1437 and SB 775 apply to eligible defendants.
Sentences for those previously convicted may be reduced or vacated entirely. Many defendants who once faced life or LWOP (life without parole) sentences now have pathways to significantly shorter terms.
Pending appeals may incorporate these new standards, potentially overturning convictions or leading to retrials. Post-conviction petitions have surged as defendants request relief under the updated laws.
Anyone convicted under outdated liability theories has the right to request a hearing, present evidence, and seek a reduced charge or release if they no longer meet the statutory criteria for murder.
For anyone facing murder allegations in Los Angeles, the updated laws directly influence how charges are filed, negotiated, and potentially reduced.
People who did not personally commit a killing now have stronger legal protections and cannot be punished as harshly for another person’s actions.
Prosecutors must now meet higher standards to show criminal intent, major participation, or reckless indifference, making murder charges harder to prove.
Defendants may avoid the most severe penalties unless prosecutors can establish full responsibility under the revised rules.
Here are some key questions that frequently arise as defendants and families try to understand how the updated statutes apply in real-world situations.
Yes, if your conviction relied on felony murder or accomplice theories no longer valid under the current law.
Accomplices can only be convicted if they intended to kill, helped with intent, or were major participants acting recklessly.
Yes. Courts must apply current law to all pending cases.
In many situations, particularly if the original conviction relied on theories eliminated by SB 1437 or SB 775.
A skilled Los Angeles murder defense lawyer can help you navigate these changes and protect your rights at every stage, ensuring your case is evaluated under the most current and favourable legal standards.
An attorney can determine whether a defendant qualifies for resentencing or a charge reduction.
Defense strategies can now focus on disproving intent, malice, or major participation.
A skilled lawyer can craft arguments around the narrowed definitions of murder, protecting clients from unlawful or excessive charges.
DCD LAW offers deep expertise in homicide cases, understands the nuances of recent reforms, and provides aggressive legal representation for individuals facing the most serious criminal charges in Los Angeles.
They narrow who can be held liable, limiting felony murder convictions to individuals who acted with major participation or clear intent.
Many individuals may petition for resentencing if their conviction no longer aligns with the revised legal standards.
In most cases, eligible defendants can seek relief when the new law applies to the conduct that led to their conviction.
The updated laws also allow certain juveniles to seek review or resentencing under the revised criteria.
Prosecutors may focus more on proving intent, level of participation, and individual culpability to meet the stricter statutory requirements.
